When choosing housing in a new building, modern investors pay special attention to the infrastructure of the residential complex. People want to see a playground next to the house, a kindergarten, a school, a green area, a car parking lot. Their desires are backed up by urban development norms. All this should be built with houses, but far from always the developers will equip residential complexes with such objects. The fact is that infrastructure facilities are not mandatory for construction. A double situation is created: on the one hand, there are standards of comfort of living, on the other, there is no law by which this comfort of living should be an integral application to the housing stock. Only competition regulates this situation. To attract customers, the builders are forced to equip a house territory, equip parking, etc. D. All this and not only, will be able to provide the Aleksandrovsky residential complex in Chelyabinsk.
One of the factors that allow builders to avoid developed infrastructure is a compulsory share contribution. It is transferred to the local City Council. The amount of the contribution is determined by the decision of this authority and is up to four percent of the estimated cost of construction. The payment method is coordinated by the parties: it may be money, infrastructure objects. If a LCD is building one developer, then he can build a school or kindergarten and transfer to the city as a contribution. In the presence of several developers, monetary deductions are possible, and then the local authorities will entrust one of the companies to build an infrastructure object for the listed money. In practice, such a situation is obtained – funds are transferred as a contribution. The construction company, of course, can build a school or preschool institution, but the city authorities are in no hurry to accept it on their balance. Thus, it will not work to count it as a contribution. For the developer, the situation is extremely not profitable.
Another trouble of new buildings is the lack of parking spaces. Developers are also trying to save on this: they rent places in neighboring areas, reduce the size of one parking space. Another way to save in parking lots: bypass the design rate of the mandatory availability of underground parking in new buildings – to draw up documents not for residential real estate, but for a commercial. In this case, the presence of parking lots is not necessary.
Developers can not always fulfill the standards for landscaping the house territory. According to the norms of DBN, there should be a one and a half meter “layer” of greenery around the house or parking. It is outdated, like many others: highlighting the area for knocking carpets, drying of linen, walking dogs, etc. But our cities, especially large ones, are so densely built up that these norms are sometimes impossible. It is high time to revise them, but for now we get housing with a minimum of infrastructure and a bunch of violations.